On 11/12/20 5:06 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Jesse Thompson > <jesse.thompson=40wisc....@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40wisc....@dmarc.ietf.org>> > wrote: > > On 11/12/20 3:23 PM, John Levine wrote: > > You now can put a DMARC > > record on a name below the org domain to shadow a subtree, but I don't > > think that is a problem that needs to be solved. > > I'm confused by this statement. Are you saying that you can "now" do > subtree shadowing with sp? as in the following language is being changed > "now"? > > > I think that John was referring the potential future state where tree-walks > were being done, but even then I don't think it would work quite that easily. > A record at "a.b.example" would not shadow "x.y.a.b.example" if "x" or "y" > chose to express some policy.
Yes, that makes sense for a defined policy to override any inherited subdomain policy. Jesse _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
