In article <e4ce658f-3a19-aa24-0fb2-2078d06fc...@crash.com> you write: >On 12/1/20 4:16 PM, Douglas Foster wrote: >> >> I have always assumed that p=quarantine and pct<>100 were included to >> provide political cover for "Nervous Nellies" who were afraid to >> enable p=reject. > >p=none, p=quarantine, and the pct= option were all included so that >organizations could set policies according to their own risk/reward >evaluation, including changes to those evaluations over time.
Do you think there was a shared understanding of how p=quarantine would be implemented? Put the mail in a spam folder? Put it in some separate place that you can check? (Mimecast does that with some dubious mail) Put it in the inbox with a warning label? I have no idea, my mail system just ignores it so I was wondering what other people do. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
