Dotzero <dotz...@gmail.com> writes: > p= DID NOT mistakenly choose to use the language of receiver > actions. p= represents the domain-owner request to the receiver as to > the disposition of messages which fail to validate. Any reading of > "concern" is supposition on the part of yourself or other self > appointed interpreters of the mind of the domain-owner or > administrator. [..] This is an interoperability standard, not a > seance.
Am I particularly thin-skinned for considering this language inflammatory? The thing is, domain owners can request anything they want, but why should anyone listen? Particularly if they are rude about it instead of asking nicely. When someone brings up a concern they have and explain why it is of benefit to either the recipient or the community to take certain actions, that will likely be heard. However, unexplained edicts are unlikely to be taken very seriously. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
