On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 2:09 PM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> Another point on readability: > > > > dmarc-request = "p" *WSP "=" *WSP > > > ( "none" / "quarantine" / "reject" ) > > Quite a few constructs include this: *WSP "=" *WSP > > Is it worth creating something like this: > > equals = *WSP "=" *WSP > > ...so we could then use... > > dmarc-request = "p" equals ( "none" / "quarantine" / "reject" ) > > ...and so on? I find that to be easier on the eyes, though others > might see it as adding complication to the ABNF. Thoughts? > > I kinda like it, and it's not that hard to change the text to use this. -- *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem *e:* todd.h...@valimail.com *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
