Ale writes (in part): >>> dmarc-rfmt = Keyword *(*WSP ":" Keyword) >>> ; registered reporting formats only >>> >>> "Keyword" is imported from Section 4.1.2 of [RFC5321].
>After 7 years, there is still only afrf. What do we expect? IODEF to rise from the grave? STIX/TAXII adoption? AFRF certainly isn't the be-all, end-all of reporting formats; it is, however, the only format that's been widely accepted. Report format is only marginally less useful than URI scheme; https scheme report targets are in the low single digits in our scanning; I count as many entries for the "charles" URI scheme as I do https... How many reporting implementations even cover HTTPS delivery? BUT, in the future, having to update the entire DMARC RFC just to re-add a flexible report format or URI target is a much bigger pain than keeping what seems now to be a useless secondary definition. -- Les
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
