On Sat 16/Jul/2022 18:12:14 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said:
No, it's not an accident. We designed the tree walk based on our knowledge of
the way people publish DMARC records.
I don't understand this unwearying opposition irrespective of the
argument. If you do a tree walk NOW (which is why I said currently)
you have exactly 0 probability to determine an abnormal PSD, since the
tag hasn't been assigned yet.
Indeed, and even so the tree walk gets the right answer nearly 100% of
the time, right now.
PSDs are rare, "abnormal" PSDs are even rarer. The PSD tag is in arcane nit.
While I'm not opposed to the psd tags, I really wish people would get
some perspective. The amount of mail they affect is tiny, the amount
affected by uber-nits like whether a PSD can be an org domain is too
small to waste so much time on.
What are the odds that malloc() returns NULL? Do you always check it?
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
