On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 6:04 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Sat 06/Aug/2022 16:29:47 +0200 John Levine wrote: > >>> I don't understand what you mean by "no data collection." It is true > that > >>> you can send a failure report immediately without saving anything for > >>> later. > >> > >> “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” – > George > >> Santayana, The Life of Reason, 1905. > > > > Perhaps I'm unusually dense today but I still don't understand what any > of > > this has to do with DMARC failure reports. > > > By remembering failure reports issued in the past, new failures having > already reported characteristics (e.g. same forwarder) can be silently > ignored. That would greatly reduce noise. > > > Best > Ale > -- > This is a horrible idea. It presupposes that failures from the same origin (e.g. same forwarder) at different points in time are the result of the same underlying cause. This may be true in some cases but not true in other cases. Operational environments are not static. Even for short time frames this is a bad approach. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
