It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 8:56 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > >> 2. Without the workaround, the real pain is not that a message from >> Comcast posted to the list doesn't get to you (though that's true): the >> real pain is that if Valimail rejects (bounces) those messages, the Mailman >> software will eventually unsubscribe you -- YOU, not the Comcast user -- >> from the list for exceeding the bounce threshold. >> > >This is laid out in RFC 6377, Section 5.2, if it would be helpful to have >something published to reference. Indeed, ADSP threatened the same damage >that DMARC "p=reject" causes, which I think was one of the reasons it never >got adopted.
It wasn't just a threat -- someone got bounced off an IETF list shortly after the ADSP draft came out when some eager beaver implemented it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
