> On Jun 12, 2023, at 6:02 PM, Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net> wrote: > > On 9 Jun 2023, at 22:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> >> You were previously talking about inserting ">" before a line starting >> "From ", which is typically done on delivery when writing to an >> mbox-formatted mailbox file, because in that format, "From " at the front >> of a line has a specific meaning (i.e., "this is a new message"). If that >> insertion is happening in transport, then a local mailbox convention is >> leaking out into the transport environment, which means something is >> misconfigured, and all bets are off. >> >> In any case, it is not a transport conversion anticipated by the section >> you're quoting, so I've no idea why a DKIM signer might opt to handle it >> specially. > > I’m not as definite that this is a misconfiguration, but might be a > historical artifact.
Very historic - UUCP days and it didn’t come with the “>” prefix. Thats something new to perhaps mask and avoid stripping at the MDA. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
