The misconfiguration is changing it after the message was signed.
Once the message is signed and in the MTA-to-MTA relay system, no one
should be altering the message body any more until final delivery.

Barry

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:02 PM Jim Fenton <fen...@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:
>
> On 9 Jun 2023, at 22:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> >
> > You were previously talking about inserting ">" before a line starting
> > "From ", which is typically done on delivery when writing to an
> > mbox-formatted mailbox file, because in that format, "From " at the front
> > of a line has a specific meaning (i.e., "this is a new message").  If that
> > insertion is happening in transport, then a local mailbox convention is
> > leaking out into the transport environment, which means something is
> > misconfigured, and all bets are off.
> >
> > In any case, it is not a transport conversion anticipated by the section
> > you're quoting, so I've no idea why a DKIM signer might opt to handle it
> > specially.
>
> I’m not as definite that this is a misconfiguration, but might be a 
> historical artifact. When we were editing RFC 4871, I remember discussing 
> with Eric Allman the problem with “from” at the beginning of a line. At the 
> time, we recognized that some messages would fail to verify because the 
> message would be modified in transit to add the >. IIRC this was particularly 
> a problem because message signing was done in a milter that operated on the 
> incoming leg of the message path (through sendmail, for example), when 
> ideally you would want signing to be done on the way out of the MTA.
>
> Your description of why the > was added is probably correct, but I think 
> there are circumstances where the > leaks out that aren’t just due to 
> misconfiguration. I have two messages in my bloated inbox that apparently 
> have had > added (many of you may have the “Communications of the ACM, May 
> 2023” message from April 24). They pass dkim verification, probably because 
> they were signed after modification.
>
> -Jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to