I'm starting this in a separate thread that I want to keep for ONLY the following question:
Do we want to use the session we have scheduled at IETF 118 to talk about the issue that clearly is still in discussion about adding a tag to specify which authentication mechanism(s) to use when evaluating DMARC? Or shall I cancel the 118 session and just let the discussion continue on the mailing list? And being clear here: the "eliminate SPF entirely" suggestion is definitely out, failing rough consensus. We're *only* talking about the suggestion to add a tag to specify what the sender wants. Barry _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
