The sense I’m getting is to cancel the session in Prague. I’ll do that tomorrow (Thursday) morning SFO time unless someone screams loudly with a convincing reason that we need to keep the session.
Barry On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 10:38 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > I'm starting this in a separate thread that I want to keep for ONLY > the following question: > > Do we want to use the session we have scheduled at IETF 118 to talk > about the issue that clearly is still in discussion about adding a tag > to specify which authentication mechanism(s) to use when evaluating > DMARC? > > Or shall I cancel the 118 session and just let the discussion continue > on the mailing list? > > And being clear here: the "eliminate SPF entirely" suggestion is > definitely out, failing rough consensus. We're *only* talking about > the suggestion to add a tag to specify what the sender wants. > > Barry >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
