On October 28, 2023 5:38:00 PM UTC, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
>I'm starting this in a separate thread that I want to keep for ONLY
>the following question:
>
>Do we want to use the session we have scheduled at IETF 118 to talk
>about the issue that clearly is still in discussion about adding a tag
>to specify which authentication mechanism(s) to use when evaluating
>DMARC?
>
>Or shall I cancel the 118 session and just let the discussion continue
>on the mailing list?
>
>And being clear here: the "eliminate SPF entirely" suggestion is
>definitely out, failing rough consensus. We're *only* talking about
>the suggestion to add a tag to specify what the sender wants.
>
I think cancel the meeting and keep the discussion on the ML.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
