On Sun 31/Mar/2024 14:22:04 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote:
On SPF, our document should say simply,
" a DMARC-compliant evaluator MUST NOT reject a message, based on SPF result,
prior to receiving the Data section and checking for aligned and verifiable
signatures."
Nonsense. Rejecting at RCPT TO is much quicker than waiting for the whole
message. People who publish -all know what they do.
I also reject based on RBLs and private IP lists; does that affect DMARC
compliance?
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
