On Tue 01/Apr/2025 18:42:09 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
It's up to you to organize yourselves and find the energy to complete any
work you want to get done by that deadline. Any document that has not
gotten through the IESG will die with the working group, which includes the
base document if it suffers neglect in the interim. And there is no
guarantee that anyone on the next IESG will be willing to sponsor it
afterwards.
That is what I called /abrupt/.
We appear to have different understandings of that word. After 9 years, I
pleaded for progress; after 10 years, I gave what amounted to a five month
deadline. I would use a word like "generous" rather than "abrupt".
10 years is even more than generous. Killing by deadline whatever the state of
the documents is abrupt.
[...]
That's for the current ADs to sort out.
Yup.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
