On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 4:48 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> The WG obviously took a good deal of time. But that's not a good reason > to > shut it down abruptly. > I don't think it was abrupt. > > > >> You did not answer my concerns wrt. the necessary document changes if > >> chosing 2 or 3, and how that would impact WG consensus. > > > > I think upthread this was already answered. Basically, option 1 is the > > most work because it requires establishing a venue to complete the task > > > >> Since I joined, I do not remember any, "we'll likely abandon failure > >> reporting" statements being made. > > > > My recollection is that we started tossing around the idea of dropping > it > > around the time of this thread: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ul1jf_q_aULEaNMDf6eoF3uFG-c/ > > > The conclusions of that thread were to quickly finish up the document. > Not > dropping it. Otherwise, we had eliminated ruf=. > > Let me quote John: > I would prefer to clarify the spec to encourage people who send > reports to send them in the right format and otherwise leave it > alone. > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/dI1OHjOdROSYNdV-tcFca3rkDjo/ > > And Barry: > As chair, I agree with John here: we have the document on our queue > and we should wrap it up and get it out. But we should not spend a > great deal of time on it. > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/j1xy-eoU60mAAe6dErXxep_MYTU/ > > > > In the last few years, there's been nearly zero work put into developing > > that document. The authors occasionally updated it, but in at least one > > spot a new version was posted mainly just to reset the six month > expiration > > clock on the draft. I would say the WG (as a whole) lost interest in > > working on it. > > > That is just consistent with Barry's directive above. > > I'm not clear how to measure a WG's energy, especially after closing it. > However, let me ask if, in case we can score a venue to terminate the work > properly, will we then be able to talk about my fix-forwarding draft? > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
