David Conrad wrote: > On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> Livingood, Jason wrote: >>> Please do send me that list of applications. I would very much like to >>> describe these use cases in the next version of the draft. >> >> Please list "The Internet" as one of them, it kinda encompasses a lot of >> others too. > > Please. Enough hyperbole.
Unless you state that "The Internet" is only "The Web", there are other users of "The Internet" though. Don't try and limit what other people can do with this public resource. I suggest that "Internet Providers" that are going to do these kind of "filtering techniques" rename themselves to "Limited Web Providers". That is much more appropriate it seems. Or we'll just have to change IETF into OIETF for the Open Internet ETF. >> I am *VERY* happy that DNSSEC is moving along perfectly fine >> which will kill any kind of changing DNS results. > > DNSSEC doesn't touch anything after the validator. It will have no > effect on the vast majority of Comcast (or other consumer oriented) > ISPs' customers. "The vast majority" aha, so discrimination of the people who do want to actually have real truthful Internet is acceptable???? I know that certain countries claim to be all about 'freedom' and 'democracy' and I don't know what, but clearly those countries and the network operators in those countries want to restrict people more than the countries which simply state that they are doing that on purpose. As a user of the Internet I *am* running a validating DNSSEC recursor on my hosts. Thanks to ISC for the DLV :) I am fairly sure that a lot of other people will also want to do this. Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
