Awesome doc, just some small observations; TTL: It might be worth using the word 'maximum' in relation to the TTL; I think there is consensus that TTLs may be truncated.
RRSet: Are the RRs in an RRSet required to have different data? For types such as A/AAAA/SRV/MX this makes sense, but maybe not for TXT. I also think views and other implementation specific features confuse things here. A user might have 10 A records defined for a given name; but if their DNS server returns one at a time (say it's using weighted round robin) - I don't think of the 10 as an RRSet; but rather it's 10 RRSets. What's actually sent on the wire is what matters, I think. Stealth server: this definition seems a bit contradictory. Starts out by saying it's a slave, but then says it can also be a master. Suggestions for section 6: Open resolver, Public resolver Suggestions for section 7: glue, child-centric, parent-centric On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > Greetings again. Andrew, Kazunori, and I have done a massive revision on the > DNS terminology draft based on the input we got on the -00. We're sure we > have further to go, but we wanted people to look over the new version and > give feedback. Thanks! > > Name: draft-hoffman-dns-terminology > Revision: 01 > Title: DNS Terminology > Document date: 2015-01-19 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 14 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-01.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-01 > Diff: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-01 > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Colm _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
