* Stephane Bortzmeyer: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:22:58PM -0700, > Francisco Obispo <fobi...@uniregistry.com> wrote > a message of 48 lines which said: > >> Well, even worse, what happens if <name-your-next-OS-vendor> decides >> to create a new dns-like protocol that uses .foo, does that mean >> that we should automatically block it? > > No need to speculate about "what happens". It already happened, the > vendor was Apple and the result was the registration of .local (first > use of RFC 6761).
Wasn't this part of RFC 6761 specifically created to allow the reservation of .LOCAL, resolving the ICANN/IETF deadlock that had prevented this before? (In other words, the causal relationship is different, so it's not really an example of what could happen.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
