>When Dave and I last discussed that draft in any detail (back in >Orlando!) my proposal was that it should for SRV-based services the only >entries should be _tcp and _udp (or other L3 protocols), and that >anything that exists in the IANA port registry (with the prepended >underscore) would be a legal label to the left of that.
I think we're in violent agreement -- that's why I want to put _client into the service registry so it doesn't further mess up the list of L3 protocols. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
