On 24 Mar 2018, at 20:20, Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote: > >> It might be a different story if one of those zombie RRtypes required >> additional processing. None spring to mind though. > > But (most of) those I picked actually *DO*: > > a) compression is allowed, so compliant and non-compliant servers can’t speak > together, because non-compliant will just store junk in the RDATA when > received from compliant server; > b) the RDATA needs to be understood and lowercased for canonical form when > DNSSEC signing; again you need to *implement* this in DNSSEC Validator as it > would cause validation failures if you don't
Fair enough Ondřej. Though I suspect the number of servers that sign or validate MAILA records (or whatever) can be counted on the number of ears on one hand. :-) FWIW the sort of additional processing I had in mind were things comparable to resolvers chasing CNAMEs or DNAME rewriting. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
