* Tim Wicinski: > For the ZONEMD RR Type, where in the registry do the authors think it > should go? While some of that falls on the Expert Review process, I think > the document authors should capture their rationale in the document. If > the proposed RR Type is greater than 256 (which I think it does), it does > not appear to require a Standards Track document, just Expert Review.
There is some talk in the draft about blocking ZONEMD queries through recursive resolvers, which wiuld put it into the meta RR space, I think. (But I disagree that there wouldn't be a loss of functionality—if the ZONEMD record contained the size of the zone, clients might want to query it, verify its signature, and only download the specified number of bytes.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
