> Il 10 marzo 2019 alle 20.15 Ask Bjørn Hansen <a...@develooper.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 2019, at 10:48 PM, Warren Kumari < > war...@kumari.net mailto:war...@kumari.net > wrote: > > > > Also, I think that this topic would be better discussed in the > > DNSOP WG - the DoH charter ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/doh/about/) > > talks about: > > "The primary focus of this working group is to develop a mechanism > > that > > provides confidentiality and connectivity between DNS clients > > (e.g., operating > > system stub resolvers) and recursive resolvers." > > > > > > I agree with this (and everything else you said). > > The new topics that are coming up all seem like they’d fit better in > DNSOP or DPRIVE. > For the sake of completeness, I will mention that I have also just posted a draft that tries to address the issues deriving from the adoption of encrypted DNS protocols, under the form of a best practice document for client applications:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/3ryu5BxcjRJO1-zeRXJaKIcIDUY I decided that dprive was the right place for it, and I will briefly present it there, but I agree that the first discussion (even in a side meeting in Prague, if there is interest) would be where to deal with the topic within the IETF, and to which extent; it would make sense to have a single coordinated discussion rather than multiple parallel ones. Regards, -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com mailto:vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
