> On Nov 13, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjh...@hardakers.net> wrote: > > I added this text to the next version: > > <t>When the response grows beyond the requestor's UDP payload > size <xref target="RFC6891" />, servers SHOULD truncate messages > by dropping EDE options before dropping other data from > packets. Implementations SHOULD set the truncation bit when > dropping EDE options.</t> Are you sure that setting TC=1 when EDE doesn't fit is the right trade-off? I'm somewhat skeptical... -- Viktor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Worki... Patrick McManus
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Worki... Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Worki... Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Worki... Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Worki... Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for dra... Michael J. Sheldon
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call fo... Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for dra... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for dra... Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call fo... Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Cal... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last... Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group ... Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working G... Richard Gibson
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working G... Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for dra... Jan Komissar (jkomissa)
- Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call fo... Wes Hardaker