Just a reminder we're looking for any feedback on continuing work on this document. The Chairs/OverLord Warren feel significant work on this document is needed, but that may not be relevant.
We're wrapping this feedback up this Sunday 11 June. (and Thanks Andrew for your comments) tim On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 6:58 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > The chairs want to thank everyone for the feedback on this document > recently. We've been in discussions with Warren and the authors about this > document, and we have some questions we'd like the working group to help us > resolve. > > While this work was relevant when it was first written and adopted, we > feel that over time the DNSSEC landscape has changed and this document may > not be as relevant as it once was. > > Questions to consider: > > Should this draft be removed from the WG? > Are there fundamental issues that need to be addressed in this document? > Are there items in the document that should be moved to another document? > > The chairs are currently considering abandoning this document in its > current state. We'd like to hear from others on this. > > We're going to let comments run for two weeks, and wrap up June 12, 2023. > > Thanks > tim > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
