there are two things in the thread that I would like to respond to. I 
will leave the details of the exact dates when things move from each 
period to craig (who is hopefully enjoying the canadian long weekend 
today). those two things are "how would I change my rap if the name has 
already gone into RGP-land" and dave's call for shame below.

my comments make one simple assumption. that there is a near-1:1 
correlation between names that end up in the tucows-parked account and 
names that you will have incoming customer calls about. these names are 
the ones with latent value and inbound traffic.

if the name has already hit RGP-land I would then add the following:

- that the name has had the DNS changed for over 30 days (craig to 
confirm exact!);
- more detail about all the notices that had been sent out and how the 
change in status (right down to the names of the nameservers) is 
intended to do everything possible to ensure that you don't lose your 
valuable names;
- I would ask to have them help you understand how they missed all this 
(not in a blame way at all but with an eye towards helping you 
understand how you can better reach other customers in the future);
- I would explain the grace process in PLAIN english (maybe we should 
put out a script now that I think about it) and help them understand i) 
why it costs more and ii) you would prefer never to have names enter 
this period and it is most decidedly NOT a way for you (or us) to make 
money;
- depending upon the sophistication of the customer I would add a bit 
about the drop and about how their name has been saved from being 
swallowed up by the pros and would be SURE to point out that if they 
had been using any other registrar (I will leave it to you to figure 
out how to explain the reseller-registrar thing but you guys are used 
to that) their name would have a much greater chance of now have a 
parked page on it AND being unrecoverable (one of the things we should 
probably also do (but will take some time) is share the timelines of 
others in relation to ours).

now for dave's call for shame. the first, and most important point is 
that the previous process was flawed for users and for the distribution 
channel (you and us). it benefited a small group of professional 
domainers that had evolved over the years from a smart group of 
hobbyists to a well-heeled group of professionals that now includes 
public companies, venture-backed companies, hedge funds and private 
equity funds as well as the companies that supplied them. there are a 
number of ex-bankers now in the space. when a name with ANY value drops 
it ends up in those hands and the customer is screwed and you and us 
see NO benefit.

we can lament that reality. we can call it unfair and we can shake our 
fists at ICANN and the sky, but the facts are as they are. I do not 
begrudge those people anything. they are smart and took advantage of a 
system and a process (and definitely of some regulatory 
inefficiencies). for me, anybody who believes names should be dropped 
for any other reason than they are taking advantage of the names 
themselves (which we always respect and facilitate) is simply wishful 
thinking. this means anyone who opts-out. it is a harkening back to 
some idyllic "way things were" or "way I think they should be" to the 
detriment of the customer and themselves.

so dave, I start from the place where I believe (strongly) that 
customers and resellers are MUCH better off with the system we have 
created. customers are better off because they have a much greater 
chance of having their important names protected and resellers are 
better off because they benefit financially which transfers dollars 
directly from pool/enom/etc and domainers to the reseller.

now one of the things we have learned in painful detail over the years 
is that in any situation where people have to make a choice by far the 
first choice is DO NOTHING. the power of the default is well known and 
understood in usability circles and you should be thinking about it 
throughout your business. so we have to make a choice in that context 
as to whether we opt-out or opt-in. in this case, after a LOT of 
internal discussion (cause we don't take this stuff lightly and know 
that some of you will feel like you do) we are all very comfortable 
that opt-in is to the benefit of customers, resellers and us. we also 
are very clear that the only losers here are domainers and their 
suppliers (by the way also our customers in many circumstances so 
believe me we have > 0 incentive to leave status quo).

that leads to opt-in. and dave, while I understand your position, I am 
not ashamed of what we have done. I am proud. I am proud that we have 
the only system that benefits customers. I am proud that we have the 
only system that is created to benefit resellers. I am proud that in 
rolling out this system it is working to the benefit of those it was 
intended to benefit.

one other thought. take a look at the marketplace. look at what other 
registrars are doing with all of these items. I will make a prediction 
for you as markets are incredibly darwinian. the high ground that we 
are taking will drive the market. we will force other registrars to 
make their processes more registrant-friendly and more 
reseller-friendly. and that will be the greatest confirmation of all.

of course as always, comments welcome and encouraged.

Regards

On Aug 7, 2006, at 12:27 AM, Dave Warren wrote:

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Bill Gerrard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It was a real message from a customer.  So you think it's okay to tell
>> them the Tucows hijacked their domain name?  We did not want to
>> participate in this parked pages program.
>
> Did you opt out (and once again, shame on Tucows for automatically
> opting us in without also indemnifying the RSPs from legal action,
> should any occur)
> -- 
> Dave Warren,
>  MSN Instant Messenger:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Phone:  (204) 480-8407  Toll free: (888) 371-3470
>                                Fax: (204) 283-6028
> _______________________________________________
> domains-gen mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to