Michel Dänzer wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 14:28, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> 
> > Log message:
> >   Put drm version back from 3.0 to 2.2; XFree86 4.1 is the baseline for
> >   versioning information.
> >
> > Modified files:
> >       xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r128/:
> >         r128_xmesa.c
> >       xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/:
> >         r128_dri.c
> >       xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/:
> >         r128_drv.c
> >
> >   Revision      Changes    Path
> >   1.25          +3 -3      xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r128/r128_xmesa.c
> >   1.27          +3 -3      xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/r128_dri.c
> >   1.42          +2 -2      
>xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/r128_drv.c
> 
> But you're aware that the major should have been bumped for 4.1 already?
> It doesn't work with 4.0.x DRM and vice versa.

Yes.  That's life.  What's important is compatibility of future versions with
4.1.  4.0 is a lost cause.  Bumping the version number now doesn't make up for
not doing it earlier, and even worse, we've promised not to bump the version
numbers from the 4.1 base line without *extremely* good reason.

Keith

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to