On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Michel Dänzer mentioned: > Well, that's the source of my confusion - I don't provide a > drm-trunk-module-2.4.18 package, and neither does Debian woody. I'll > just assume you built it yourself from drm-trunk-module-src.
Ah yes, I did build it from your drm-trunk-module-src package. > > wolf.x86: radeon_ioctl.h:165: radeonAllocCmdBuf: Assertion `rmesa->dri.drmMinor >= >3' failed. > > Received signal 6, exiting... > Now you need to make sure the new DRM is actually used. The easiest way > to achieve that is probably to disable the DRM in the kernel. I don't understand...I've got these loaded at the moment: ratbert:/var/www# lsmod Module Size Used by Not tainted i810 64472 0 (unused) radeon 107896 0 (unused) radeonfb 17888 0 (unused) fbcon-cfb24 4320 0 [radeonfb] fbcon-cfb8 3392 0 [radeonfb] fbcon-cfb32 3744 0 [radeonfb] fbcon-cfb16 4032 0 [radeonfb] Should the radeon.o not be loaded ? What would then provide the DRM functionality ? John ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
