On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 21:53, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote: > [SNIP] > > > >>>To XFree86? Well, that's another question. > >> > >>That sounds more negative than I wanted. Basically, after the drivers are > >>living in Mesa cvs, we could well end up just submitting patches to XFree86 > >>for the rest - but that would be giving up a significant amount of control. > >>Probably we'd always want to maintain an xc/ tree somewhere for infrastructure > >>work. > > > > > > Some of us have write access there already, but I agree that access for > > all active developers would be very important if not a requirement. > > If you are worried about access issues, why ask dawes for a seperate > CVSROOT on xfree86.org which you controlled access to?
Doesn't sound like the worst scenario to me, but I find the benefits of a shared repository rather tempting. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel