On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote:
-- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the universe feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And again) I still don't want to use it.
I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use CVS?
Primarily the difficulty of creating an automated two-way bridge between them. As I understood it, the BK->CVS gateway you've talked about is a one-way affair, right?
If we ever did change version systems, it would be nice to make it an opt-in affair, where CVS continued working seemlessly with the newer system. It's not clear that could be achieved without a human in the loop to resolve the inevitable conflicts, but your statements above make me think maybe you believe it can?
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
