On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 05:27, Chris Ison wrote: > > DRI is still quite young and alot of people still have the "Screw you > Billy Goat" attitude,
Like who? > to them FREE means no cost of any kind, I wonder how many times I'm gonna have to say I care about free speech, not free beer. > and the opotunuity to see "how" it was done without restrictions. > Afterall, this is how we learn, through observation of others. Glad you understand this part at least. > What has confused me here is that DRI is having anoncvs issues, and > instead of focusing on the problem, simply by looking for another host > (even is someone pays for it, but then there is that free issue again), > a flame war has started up and ya all sounding like a bunch of 2 year > olds. > > Larry McVoy's suggestion may be a hot issue, but its certainly no reason > for both sides to argue about it, all that was needed to be said was > that DRI is looking for another CVS host as cvs suits the needs of the > DRI team, and its compatable with the Xfree86 repository. I don't remember any DRI developer doing anything else. It's other people who are saying we absolutely have to use this non-free tool all of a sudden, just because we're having hosting problems. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
