On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:40, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:21:04PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS. > > > > > > > > I know bk is the best version control system in the universe > > > > feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And again) > > > > I still don't want to use it. > > > > > > I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the > > > people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use CVS? > > > > Nothing whatsoever. But IMHO there's something wrong with people who > > keep trying to shove non-free tools down everyone else's throats. > > The problem with that statement is that it implies that you speak for > everyone, in particular the people who have commit rights in the CVS > tree.
I don't speak for anyone but myself. Which part of 'CVS isn't the problem' is so hard for you guys to understand? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
