On Friday 04 February 2005 21:52, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Here again, ideally this would get folded upstream too, once it's at > > least secure. > > > > I can't really mandate a policy since I haven't been contributing much > > to r300, but I would like to hear how people think this should progress. > > Folding DRM driver is not difficult, in fact currently there is just one > extra file with r300-specific code. > > As for folding R300 driver, we'll see how things turn out. It is hard > for me to imagine how this folding could take place - albeit it might turn > out to be not too bad.
You know, I actually started the r300 driver with this in mind, which is why you'll still see all those r200_* files around. The thing is, I neither have the hardware to test whether it still works on R200, nor can I currently contribute much to development. It really shouldn't require a complete rewrite, just a lot of careful (and tedious) refactoring. cu, Nicolai
pgphN0PekkQlU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
