On 6/21/05, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While this will probably work today it will leave little room for future > applications of DRI.
Can XvMC needs be handled via the V4L interface? I would expect an some point relevant V4L drivers will also get integrated into the DRM/fbdev composite driver. Is 8K of memory not enough for VIA? Or is the problem that there are three structures being placed in sarea: DRM, via DRM, via XvMC. With three structures you can't tell the offset to load the third one at. Could the three structures problem be fixed by just combining the structure defs for via DRM and via XvMC? Another solution is to create another shared memory type. -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
