On 10/13/07, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do > > think it's worth moving forward with this though. Personally, I get > > these patches off of my plate and can focus on the next steps. > > I'm all for making forward progress and abandoning broken interfaces as > early as possible. > > The only people this will inconvenience should be developers and early > adopters, and we can help them by pushing releases of the related bits > sooner rather than later. I'm assuming that the X server patches you > mention will still build and run against older other bits, right?
Yeah, only the X server and mesa need to be upgraded in lock step here. All of the git mesa drivers still compile and work with the git X server and we can pick one pair of DDX and DRI drivers at a time to port to TTM. Kristian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
