-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:47:12 +0000 > Von: Mark Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: dspam-dev@lists.nuclearelephant.com > Betreff: Re: [dspam-dev] PHP UI alternative to dspamCC
> Steve wrote: > > It depends how you retrain. If you have the tokens already inside the > storage engine and linked to a signature, then retraining with just the > signature is enough. If you don't store the tokens with a signature inside the > storage engine or you purged the signature including the tokens already from > the storage engine, then training with just the signature is not the way > to go. > > > > It would be signature based that I'm interested in. > > As I understand it I do have to pass a user to dspam when I do the > retraining (is that correct? I'm not at my server to check), > This can be right and wrong. Right: When you have the user uid in the signature and you allow DSPAM to switch the user when retraining, then you don't need to specify a user while retraining. Wrong: If you have plain signatures without the uid of the user in it, then you must specify the user name whit the retraining command. > so does it > basically not matter what user I give dspam if I'm giving it a signature? > No. It does matter. See above. > -- > Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0845 45 89 555 > Registered in England (0456 0902) at 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG Steve -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail