Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I really expect the second to refer to the first (and this kind of >> things do happen, when dvc-foo is a dispatching function, and >> dvc-dvc-foo is a possible target for the dispatch). > > You shouldn't have that expectation. It's called "dvc-funcall" for a > reason, and it makes perfect sense for it to not call the exact > function "foo". What does not make sense, ever, is using a > funcall-like function on a string.
It doesn't look like I'm going to win this particular point, so I'll
have to concede it for now. I'm about to send in a patch that makes
dvc-funcall and a real dvc-apply. Both will take a string argument.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgpJoTmhjqWqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
