On Jan 26, 2009, at 7:05 PM, Highlander II wrote: > I don't know if this is an issue from the LJ/IJ side or from the > GMail side (and I don't know if it affects other e-mail clients, > since I only use GMail): > > LJ: user posts 3 entries in 3 diff communities; someone replies to > entry1; GMail stacks/threads all comments to that entry in one > email; someone replies to entry2; GMail stacks/threads all comment > to that entry in a 2nd email; etc. > > IJ: user posts 3 entries in 3 diff communities; someone replies to > entry1; GMail stacks/threads all comments to that entry in one > email; someone replies to entry2; GMail stacks/threads all comment > to that entry in the same email as entry1; ditto for entry3 - > unless a subject line is added, then all entries with the same > subject line are stacked together. (granted, I believe it's been > mentioned that Squeaky is trying to fix this, I'm just not sure > when he's gonna get to it.) > > > Question: Which model is DW going to follow? > > Desired: The LJ model, please. I like my threads to be organized > and the LJ model keeps things structured. I don't like sifting > through a long list of comments trying to find the one that I > haven't responded to yet b/c when I opened the mail, then marked it > 'unread', the whole thread goes 'unread' again. (which is a GMail > thing, sort of, but linked to the IJ issue too).
IIRC, LJ introduced a change a while back to improve the odds that Gmail will thread properly, so if Squeaky updates IJ to the latest comment-sending code in the LJ source repo, it should be fixed for IJ too. We merged in the LJ code as of a few weeks ago, so DW should behave as LJ behaves. --D -- Denise Paolucci [email protected] Dreamwidth Studios: Open Source, open expression, open operations. Coming soon! _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
