To clarify for people who don't know, LoudTwitter was not designed specifically for LJ, which is why it doesn't have options for tags or cuts. As Katie said, it does use divs that can be blocked with CSS, but (ironically) only if the LT user has chosen *not* to put it behind a cut.
Also, it was my impression that DW was planning a feature that let you subscribe to tags, but not filter tags out. From a coding perspective the second option is harder, and I don't see how it would work. (still adding my +1 to collapse rather than force cut) On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Azalais Aranxta <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Aileen wrote: > > > To complicate matters again, what if you don't want to kill LoudTwitter > for > > everyone, just for those one or two annoying people who post pages and > pages > > of one-sided conversations? At that point a universal opt-in goes out the > > window. > > does loudtwitter tag itself? If you can unsubscribe to certain > tags on certain journals, that might be the solution. > > **************************************************************** > Azalais Aranxta (~malfoy) > ataniell93 on LiveJournal and Vox > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malfoymadness > > "I know the true world, and you know I do. But we needn't let it > think we all bow down." --Christopher Fry >
_______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
