AMENDMENT: I *do* agree with the function to filter by tags. As far as I know, that is something DW is definitely implementing at some point, correct?
- Chasy. On 4/16/09, chasy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess my mode of operation is, "if I don't like it, I don't read it." I > don't really agree that people's entries should be forced behind a cut just > because *I* don't want to read it. I have friends who use LoudTwitter (yes, > it drives me crazy too, because my thought is, if I'm interested in what you > have to say on Twitter, I will follow you), who post about the specific > details of their sex life, who share a YouTube video almost every day, etc. > --> but if I don't want that stuff on my reading page, that's on *me*, not > them. Either I unsubscribe, put up and shut up (as gossymer so eloquently > put it *wink*), or simply SKIP it. > > I don't understand why this--^ isn't an acceptable option. It's not that > inconvenient to scroll past the "offending" entry. > > - Chasy. >
_______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
