Lol, I don't get why unsubscribing - or scrolling - have to be our only two options. As an opt-in feature, people who would rather not see loudtwitter can have them cut - just as with img placeholders. So people who post loudtwitter don't have *anything* forced onto them. It would just mean more options for people.
But I really, really want a minimise/collapse button so I don't have to beg people to 'cut, plz' everytime someone posts something insanely long/very graphic. -g On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:16:52 -0700, chasy <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess my mode of operation is, "if I don't like it, I don't read it." I > don't really agree that people's entries should be forced behind a cut > just > because *I* don't want to read it. I have friends who use LoudTwitter > (yes, > it drives me crazy too, because my thought is, if I'm interested in what > you > have to say on Twitter, I will follow you), who post about the specific > details of their sex life, who share a YouTube video almost every day, > etc. > --> but if I don't want that stuff on my reading page, that's on *me*, > not > them. Either I unsubscribe, put up and shut up (as gossymer so eloquently > put it *wink*), or simply SKIP it. > > I don't understand why this--^ isn't an acceptable option. It's not that > inconvenient to scroll past the "offending" entry. > > - Chasy. _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
