Hello Tzeweng Foong,

As closer to the source as clearer the water. The ISO/CEFACT Joint
Syntax Working Group is the authority who maintains the EDIFACT syntax
structures. We are honored to host the results of this work on our Web
site:

http://www.gefeg.com/jswg/

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Best regards,

Frank Dreisch
GEFEG mbH

UN/CEFACT Joint Syntax Working Group (JSWG):
http://www.gefeg.com/jswg
XML/EDI with GEFEG EDIFIX:
http://www.gefeg.com/xml/index.htm
Document SAP IDocs:
http://www.gefeg.com/fx40/sapidoc.htm
MIGs in HTML:
http://www.gefeg.com/mig/mightml.htm

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home page: http://www.gefeg.com
Tel: +49-30-9799-1465
Fax: +49-30-9799-1422
----- Original Message -----
From: Tzeweng Foong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 3:47 AM
Subject: Controling the CONTRL message !


Hello Listers,

This CONTRL message thing !! Well why are there so
many different types..( well actually only 2.)

Type 1             Type 2
=============================
UNH              ! UNH
UCI              ! UCI
  UCM            !   UCM
  UCX            !     UCS
    UCR          !     UCD
    UCD          !
                 !   UCF
  UCF            !     UCM
  UCY            !       UCS
    UCM          !       UCD
    UCX          !   UNT
      UCR        !
      UCD        !
TXT              !
UNT              !
------------------------------

Is one older than the other? Which version should we
be using. Should we cater for both on a partner to
partner basis? I cannot seem to find documentation for
Type 1 above on the internet.

I understand that these CONTRL messages are generated
by the receiving translator but I need to generate
them. (argg pain...) How and where are the rules to
create CONTRL messages? Is there a subset(convention)
I can use to say Reject/accept the whole thing..
(interchange) or Group or just messages... and ignore
the segment level and element level stuff?

Please help any pointers would be most appreciated!!

(Mutter mutter ..) Always hated these CONTRL messages.
never thought they were any use at all. (Grumble ....)
should just use application level acknowledgements...

Thanks in advance for any help you listers can provide..

Tze Weng Foong

======================================================================
=
To signoff the EDI-L list,  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list,  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe,               mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

Reply via email to