Tzeweng Foong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
This CONTRL message thing !! Well why are there so
many different types..( well actually only 2.)
Type 1 Type 2
=============================
UNH ! UNH
UCI ! UCI
UCM ! UCM
UCX ! UCS
UCR ! UCD
UCD !
! UCF
UCF ! UCM
UCY ! UCS
UCM ! UCD
UCX ! UNT
UCR !
UCD !
TXT !
UNT !
-----------------------------
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Searching through my archives of EDIFACT standards, from 901 onwards,
I find references, but not specification, for CONTRL in the 911, 912, 922
and 932 directories. Unfortunately, they all refer to a section which is
not included in the documentation.
In my D93A archive, I have a specification for CONTRL V2. This I think
is the original draft, dated 27th August 1993, which was not issued as part
of the directory. I am not sure where I got it from. The layout matches
Type 2 above. I don't think the message definition for CONTRL ever gets
issued in the directory. Since it is a service message, it may be issued
within the EDIFACT syntax specifications. As far as I know, this is the
latest version.
I then took a look at my original printed documentation set for the
ODETTE (European automotive) messages. There I found a CONTRL V1 which
matches the Type 1 above. The document is a copy of a June 1989 UNSM for
Formal Trial, issued by TRADE/WP.4/R.589. I have never found any other
copies of this specification. I presume this is superseded by the V2 above.
Hopes this helps
Chris Hill
Technical Support Manager
AP Hydraulics Ltd
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/