This is a sign of a "home grown" translator on the other end. I am unaware of any "major" player whose application cannot handle this.
Having said this, it is very uncommon for EDIFACT users to send or accept multiple transaction types in a single envelope. There is a UNG available for this, but it's not mandatory (unlike GS) and if you look closely at any EDIFACT data, you'll see it's not there. Maybe our friends across the pond could weigh in on why this is? Chris? Klaus-Dieter? Leah ________________________________ From: Travis Truax <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 8:24 AM Subject: [EDI-L] Segregation in Interchanges We have a partner who pitches a fit if they receive an ISA that contains more than one transaction set type. Send 810s by themselves, send 997s by themselves, etc.. Just curious if this is common or strange. I haven't dealt with anyone else similar in 15 years, but we don't have a huge trading community, either. Travis- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
