On 06/16/16 19:14, Bill Paul wrote:
> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Jordan Justen had to 
> walk into mine at 09:37:31 on Thursday 16 June 2016 and say:
> 
>> On 2016-06-16 09:19:41, Bill Paul wrote:
>>> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Jordan Justen
>>> had to
>>>
>>> walk into mine at 18:11:27 on Wednesday 15 June 2016 and say:
>>>> Can you use git send-email rather than KMail to send your patches, so
>>>> they will be threaded?
>>>
>>> You know, I spent about 10 minutes looking over my patches trying to
>>> think of there was *anything* I'd forgotten to do that someone might
>>> nitpick me over and for once I thought I'd gotten everything right. I
>>> guess should have known better.
>>>
>>> No, actually, I can't use git send-email. I only have one machine that's
>>> setup to send e-mail and it's not the one I used for development.
>>
>> Yeah. I've had a similar situation with some temp dev machines. Two
>> things that I've used in the past are:
>>
>> 1. Push the branch to a personal git repo. Fetch it on the machine
>>    that can send email. Generate and send the patches.
>>
>> 2. Generate the patches, and copy them to a machine that can send the
>>    patches. Use git send-email to send the patches.
> 
> That's fine, but are you saying I have to do one of these thing right now in 
> order to get these patches accepted?

Assuming you would like me to *find* your patches, it would not hurt :)

Yesterday I was out of the office unexpectedly -- for one day. When I
downloaded my emails today, I was greeted by 85 (eighty five) emails
just in my INBOX (needing my personal attention). It took me more than
eight hours to wade through them, handling each one to its merit -- some
quickly, some very carefully.

After eight hours, I've now reached my edk2-devel folder, with ~40
unread messages. At the top, there is your message, with subject

[edk2] [PATCH 0/2] Update UNIXGCC toolchain and make it work again

Given that neither your blurb subject says OvmfPkg, nor was I CC'd as
OvmfPkg co-maintainer, in general I would have blissfully slid over your
email. However, in Thunderbird's threaded view, I noticed that Jordan
responded, which made me slightly curious, and I started reading your
email. That's when I found the OVMF mention at the bottom, and saw the
OvmfPkg/ paths in the diffstat.

And then you expect me to hunt down your un-threaded patches, scattered
all over my (obviously) threaded edk2-devel folder. Are you serious? :)

If you follow the rules, you waste a little bit of your time, and save
the maintainers time. If you ignore the rules, you save time for
yourself, and waste the maintainers' time. There are more contributors
than maintainers. Please do the math.

Laszlo

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to