On 28 Aug 2001 06:38:49 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis Roberts) wrote: > SO, when bonds hits 73 ... what will people say vis a vis regression to the > mean? "... steroids ..." ? (have to guess that for the 56 he already has.) -- Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ =================================================================
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs dennis roberts
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs EugeneGall
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs EugeneGall
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs dennis roberts
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Stan Brown
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Dennis Roberts
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Robert Chung
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Robert Chung
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Dennis Roberts
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Robert Chung
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs EugeneGall
- Re: Regression to the mean,Barry Bonds & HRs Rich Ulrich