In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 08:56 AM 11/16/01 -0700, Roy St Laurent wrote:
>>It's not clear to me whether recent posters are serious about these
>>examples, but
>>I will reiterate my previous post:

>>For most mathematics / statistics examinations, the "answer" to a
>>question is the
>>*process* by which the student obtains the incidental final number or
>>result.
>>The result itself is most often just not that important to evaluating
>>students'
>>understanding or knowledge of the subject.  And therefore an unsupported

>>or lucky answer is worth nothing.

>the problems with the above are twofold:

>1. this assumes that correct answers are NOT important ... (which believe 
>me if you are getting change from a cashier, etc. etc. ... ARE ... we just 
>cannot say that knowing the process but not being able to come up with a 
>correct answer ... = good performance)

>2. that answers without any OTHER supplied information on the part of the 
>examinee can't be taken as "knowledge" when, it (sometimes) can be

>what if you asked on an exam ... the following:

>1. what is the mean of 10, 9, 8, 8 and 7? _____

>2. what is the mean of 27, 23, 19, 17 and 16? ____

>3. what is the mean of 332, 234, 198, 239, and 200? _____

>4. what is the mean of 23.4, 19.8, 23.1, 19.0, and 26.4? _____

>and, for each of 1 to 4 ... they put down in the blanks, the correct answers

>would you be willing to say that they know how to calculate the mean ... 
>ie, they know the process that is needed (and can implement it)?

What is achieved by asking these questions on an exam?  I can
see some SIMILAR, but quite different, questions.  A good
exam, at any level, consists of a few real problems, not 
the type of answer which a computer program could grind out.

>i think you would EVEN though there is no other supporting process 
>information given by the examinee
-- 
This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         Phone: (765)494-6054   FAX: (765)494-0558


=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=================================================================

Reply via email to