Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: > > And I think a lot of the "skill" should be credited to the ops on the > other end who manage to pull out the QRP stations. >
I agree. Most of the credit should go the the station that copies QRP stations. It's one thing to generate a weak signal but entirely another to be able to *receive* weak signals. IMHO the latter is MUCH more difficult ...and more satisfying to me personally. I enjoy operating QRP from portable sites using makeshift antennas but I give 99% of the credit to the guy on the other end. 73, Bill P.S. I run 1.5 kW on Topband but always get a thrill working QRP callers. http://www.eham.net/articles/10078 -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KPA500-just-500-watts-tp5959017p5960939.html Sent from the [QRO] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
