Hi, I wish I had better drawing skills - a picture is worth more than a 1000 words. The utility would communicate with the KAT500 as it does now plus an additional connection to the K3 - either directly or through LP-Bridge. Changes would be required to the utility and the KAT500 firmware, none to LP-Bridge. But the question is if it's worth doing to save that one little squirt of RF needed to tell the tuner the exact frequency.
AB2TC - Knut Don Wilhelm-4 wrote > LP-Bridge alone will not help. While K3 Utility can obtain the > frequency information through LP-Bridge, that information would only be > sent out the same serial port back to the K3 - nothing gained. Remember > that the KAT500 uses a different serial connection than does the K3, so > that data would have to be sent to the KAT500 via a different serial > port (not connected to the K3). > > 73, > Don W3FPR > <snip> -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-and-OT-Is-a-tuner-using-VNA-feasible-tp7567559p7567647.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
