Dale Hmm. I very well could have set Hi = 3.0 and that would set up the scenario you mentioned. Cool. That should not take long to try.
However, I don't recall an absolute requirement for filter parity between main and sub rx as the firmware should select the largest available even when desired BW > filter BW. I know diversity quality would be impacted if the filters were not identical but I would not have expected a -freq- shift like I observed. OK I just tried WWV with Lo = 0.00 and Hi = 3.0 on A and B VFO (using BSET). I am in USB Diversity mode tuned to WWV 10.000 MHz. WWV sounds fine XFIL = FL2 (6 kHz) <-- yep. this is expected. I hit BSET XFIL = FL3 (2.8 kHz) <-- Actually this is what I expected since this is the widest filter on RX B where Main: 1=15k, 2=6k, 3=2.8k, 4=2.1k, 5=0.4k Sub: 1=0.0, 2=0.0, 3=2.8k, 4=2.1k, 5=0.4k ... and no mysterious frequency shift. I still can't figure out where the 1.5 kHz shift came from but I'm grateful it is gone! Rick AG6AY -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-Odd-freq-shift-in-diversity-mode-after-VFO-upgrade-tp7604845p7604856.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
